5.0 out of 5 stars Easy to use!

M. · June 10, 2025

(function() { P.when('cr-A', 'ready').execute(function(A) { if(typeof A.toggleExpanderAriaLabel === 'function') { A.toggleExpanderAriaLabel('review_text_read_more', 'Read more of this review', 'Read less of this review'); } }); })(); .review-text-read-more-expander:focus-visible { outline: 2px solid #2162a1; outline-offset: 2px; border-radius: 5px; } It works great I have had many thermometers for my kids over the years but this works better then the others I have had a lot easier and can check them wile sleeping with out waking them. It seams like great quality!

5.0 out of 5 stars User friendly and handy

L.i.v.s.a.f.e.t.p.o.B.i.c.w.e.s.�. · June 16, 2025

Bought this has part of a gift for a baby. Very handy for Mothers

5.0 out of 5 stars Very nice to have for your baby

Y. · June 12, 2025

Very convenient and quick to use. Counterchecked with other types of thermometer and it seems to give accurate readings

4.0 out of 5 stars Good item

m. · June 3, 2025

A bit tricky to use but solid quality item. I dont know how accurate. Need a comparison

5.0 out of 5 stars Easy, touch less to the forehead

L. · May 24, 2025

Just like the title says, no need to touch the forehead to get the accurate temp. Color was the exact way as displayed, size is prefect has never fallen out of my hands. Very durable I’ve had it 2 yrs and I’ve only ever replaced batteries once.

1.0 out of 5 stars An inaccurate, unreliable thermometer isn't a usable thermometer at all!

A. · July 12, 2024

Read all the instructions and used as directed.Readings in someone with a fever were both inaccurate and imprecise (gave a medically dangerous underestimate).Readings in someone with no fever were closer to the truth (moderate overestimate).I also checked it against results from a proven accurate thermometer that is harder to use.Foreheads often are not a good reflection of core temperature (only tympanic and rectal temps are good reflections of core temperature). So, I wasn't expecting perfection but I figured the company had done it's due diligence and was marketing a no touch forehead thermometer because it worked (as in the technology employed had advanced to the point that is was sufficiently accurate for medical decision-making purposes).I would have been happy if the thermometer read a degree lower than core temp but at least did so reliably. If it read 1 degree lower all the time because skin is cooler I would be able to factor that in to my assessment of whether someone needs medical attention or to stay home from social gatherings.However, it gave me wildly different temperature readings when used on the same very feverish person, at the same angle and distance in the same lighting taken within seconds of each other.I compared it against a proven accurate household utility thermometer that reads packed ice water correctly as 32F (0 Celsius) and full boil water as 212F (100 Celsius) very consistently as well as correctly measuring a mixture of equal parts of the two. I also compared it to another older oral digital medical thermometer that has tolerable but less impressive accuracy (had to use armpit and oral for these because the utility thermometer has a pointy metal tip that is unsuitable for any other body part - so these should be higher but not 2.5-3 degrees difference).Here is a list of some of the readings:Vetted Thermometer: 103.6 This product: 101.8Vetted Thermometer: 104.2 This product: 100.4 (almost categorizing a serious fever as a non fever!)Vetted Thermometer: 97.5 This product: 98.6Vetted Thermometer: 97.2 This product: 98.7Vetted Thermometer: 97.6 This product: 99.6Vetted Thermometer: 98.0 This product: Lo errorI have no use for a thermometer that is only modestly accurate when someone doesn't have a fever and wildly inaccurate when someone does have a fever. Errors ranged from a minimum of 1 degree to almost 3 degrees. What use is that?This is not the sort of thing any person wants to be dealing with when they, their children or spouse is very sick.I see by review analysis of this product that"8,572 customers mention "Accuracy" 5,233 positive 3,339 negative"How on Earth does a thermometer that is found to be inaccurate by nearly 40% of users have a product rating over 4 stars?Some even commented that "it works well but isn't accurate" !!!An inaccurate thermometer works about as "well" as a car that doesn't move or a cell phone that only dials random numbers!Perhaps it is a severe quality control issue and half of them really do work better but there are many reviews from those who tried replacements of this product with no luck as well.If you do buy it, I'd suggest testing it out on both ends of its functional temperature range (around 97 degrees to 107 degrees) within 30 days. I bought it as a suggested item because I knew I should have another in the house and can't even return it because we didn't have any fevers to test it on for 2 months and the return window closed.Really, I would suggest finding a legit tympanic thermometer and just embrace the annoyance of probe covers because it may not even be possible to get a truly valid reading using infra-red on a feverish forehead that is actively engaged in evaporative cooling.In contrast, tympanic membranes don't sweat and the ear canal limits cooling air flow while the probe is inserted; also, there is less interference from possible environmental infra-red light interference. So there are at least three features which would help lead to a more accurate reading using the tympanic method. (some tympanic models require probe covers but if you don't like this type of plastic waste you can just reuse a probe cover after cleaning it with alcohol & write individuals initials on the base of the cover).

5.0 out of 5 stars Excelente!!

D.P. · June 17, 2025

excelente!! funciona muy bien y el precio muy conveniente!!

5.0 out of 5 stars Recommended

L.M. · June 11, 2025

Excellent. Give good temperatures and is very easy to use. Consistent temperatures!

Highly Reliable and Comfortable Thermometer – Perfect for All Ages!

L. · September 7, 2024

(function() { P.when('cr-A', 'ready').execute(function(A) { if(typeof A.toggleExpanderAriaLabel === 'function') { A.toggleExpanderAriaLabel('review_text_read_more', 'Read more of this review', 'Read less of this review'); } }); })(); .review-text-read-more-expander:focus-visible { outline: 2px solid #2162a1; outline-offset: 2px; border-radius: 5px; } The iHealth No-Touch Forehead Thermometer is fantastic! It’s incredibly easy and comfortable to use, whether for adults or kids. The no-touch feature is convenient and hygienic, making it ideal for quick and accurate readings. I trust it completely for monitoring temperatures and it’s become an essential part of our medical routine. Highly recommend!

Quality product.

D.7. · April 7, 2025

iHealth products are always of high quality and easy to use.

Relativ genau

I. · December 29, 2021

Grundsätzlich funktioniert das Thermometer wie gewünscht und die Werte weichen kaum im von den Messungen im Ohr ab. Allerdings schwanken die Messergebnisse sehr stark abhängig von der gemessenen Stelle , dass ist aber ein normales Verhalten.Es eignet sich super um bei den schlafenden Kindern die Temperatur zu kontrollieren ohne diese zu wecken.

Bon rapport qualité prix

b. · March 1, 2025

Vraiment bien , température fiable0,2 de différence comparé au thermomètre rectale.Très facile d utilisation, juste à appuyer sur 1 bouton.Je recommande ++

Works, but takes a few tries sometimes

B.L. · September 11, 2024

The good: it works. The readings are consistent. Some people complained they are inaccurate – well, I can’t say whether they are or aren’t, but they are consistent when I try a few times. Which sometimes I have to do, because it requires very specific distance from the skin in a very specific spot.The vibrating is very handy. When I had Covid I would check my temperature and honestly had no energy to drag myself to the mirror, so I would just sort of hover it around the spot until the thermometer vibrated and I knew that was it.No clue how long the battery last, but so far it looks like the answer is ‘forever’. If I didn’t sometimes have to try up to eight times it would be an instant 5*.